Criteria for Violation of the Board of Directors in Signing the Statement of Responsibility

Oct 13, 2025 by pynkocean.com 71 views

Directors' Responsibility for the Financial Statements of Public Companies: A Legal Review

Introduction

The company, especially public companies, is an important forum for business people in carrying out its business activities. Here, the role of the Board of Directors is very crucial, because they are fully responsible for the company's management, interests and goals. The authority of the Board of Directors also includes the company's representation both inside and outside the court. As a form of transparency, public companies with a minimum of 300 shareholders and paid up capital of Rp3,000,000,000 (three billion rupiah) must submit regular financial statements to the Capital Market Supervisory Agency (Bapepam). This is regulated in Bapepam Regulation Number VIII.G.7. In each financial statement, the Directors of Public Companies are required to issue a statement of directors' responsibility for the financial statements signed by the President Director and Finance Director.

The Importance of Directors' Responsibility for Financial Statements

The Directors of Public Companies are required to issue a statement of directors' responsibility for the financial statements, which is a crucial aspect of corporate governance. This statement is a declaration of the Directors' responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of the financial statements. The statement is signed by the President Director and Finance Director, and it binds the Directors legally and is the juridical responsibility of all members of the Board of Directors. The Directors' responsibility for financial statements is essential to ensure that the financial statements are accurate, reliable, and transparent.

Criteria for Violation of the Board of Directors in Signing the Statement of Responsibility

The Board of Directors can be considered to have committed a violation in signing a statement of responsibility for financial statements if it meets one of the following criteria:

The substance of the financial statements is not made in good faith and full of responsibility for the sake and purpose of the company's business. This means that the Directors must ensure that the financial statements are prepared in good faith and with a sense of responsibility, without any intention to deceive or mislead stakeholders.
Directors do not apply the standard of care (caution standards) in the process of preparing financial statements, resulting in negligence which is detrimental to other parties. This means that the Directors must exercise due care and caution in preparing the financial statements, and must not be negligent in their duties.
Directors exceed the authority (Ultra Vires), both in matters that are prohibited in the company's articles of association and to applicable regulations or public order. This means that the Directors must not exceed their authority and must comply with the company's articles of association and applicable regulations.
Business decisions taken by the Board of Directors are not based on rational bases (rational reasons) that are worthy of being trusted as the best for the company. This means that the Directors must make business decisions based on rational and sound reasons, and must not make decisions that are arbitrary or capricious.

Form of Directors' Accountability for Financial Statements

If there is information or material facts that are incorrect or misleading in the financial statements that cause losses to other parties, all members of the Board of Directors of Public Company are responsible for a joint responsibility. This is because the statement of directors' responsibility for financial statements binds legally and is the juridical responsibility of all members of the Board of Directors. Although the President Director and Finance Director who signed the statement acts to and on behalf of the company, the joint responsibility remains in effect as long as the principle of duty of care, good faith, and rational basis in the preparation of financial statements applied by them.

Suggestions for Refinement of Rules

This study suggested that the Bapepam UUPT and Regulation Number VIII.G.11 be refined, especially related to:

A more clear and detailed description of good and full of responsibility, which includes the standard of care, the principle of duty of care, good faith, and rational base in business decision making. This means that the rules should provide a clear and detailed description of the standard of care, duty of care, good faith, and rational basis that the Directors must apply in preparing the financial statements.
Affirmation of the boundaries and the extent to which liability randomly all members of the Civil Board of Directors. This means that the rules should provide a clear and detailed description of the boundaries and extent of liability of the Directors, and should not leave any ambiguity or uncertainty.
Arrangements regarding criminal sanctions on any violations of the financial statements of the Directors of Public Company as Lex Specialists from the Capital Market Provisions. This means that the rules should provide for criminal sanctions on any violations of the financial statements of the Directors of Public Company, and should provide for a clear and detailed description of the sanctions and penalties.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the Directors of Public Companies have a crucial role in ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the financial statements. The Directors' responsibility for financial statements is essential to ensure that the financial statements are accurate, reliable, and transparent. The criteria for violation of the Board of Directors in signing the statement of responsibility are clear and well-defined, and the form of Directors' accountability for financial statements is also clear and well-defined. The suggestions for refinement of rules are also clear and well-defined, and are intended to improve the clarity and detail of the rules.
Directors' Responsibility for the Financial Statements of Public Companies: A Legal Review

Q&A: Directors' Responsibility for Financial Statements

Q: What is the role of the Board of Directors in preparing financial statements?

A: The Board of Directors is responsible for ensuring that the financial statements are accurate, reliable, and transparent. They must exercise due care and caution in preparing the financial statements, and must not be negligent in their duties.

Q: What is the significance of the statement of directors' responsibility for financial statements?

A: The statement of directors' responsibility for financial statements is a declaration of the Directors' responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of the financial statements. It binds the Directors legally and is the juridical responsibility of all members of the Board of Directors.

Q: What are the criteria for violation of the Board of Directors in signing the statement of responsibility?

A: The Board of Directors can be considered to have committed a violation in signing a statement of responsibility for financial statements if it meets one of the following criteria:

The substance of the financial statements is not made in good faith and full of responsibility for the sake and purpose of the company's business.
Directors do not apply the standard of care (caution standards) in the process of preparing financial statements, resulting in negligence which is detrimental to other parties.
Directors exceed the authority (Ultra Vires), both in matters that are prohibited in the company's articles of association and to applicable regulations or public order.
Business decisions taken by the Board of Directors are not based on rational bases (rational reasons) that are worthy of being trusted as the best for the company.

Q: What is the form of Directors' accountability for financial statements?

A: If there is information or material facts that are incorrect or misleading in the financial statements that cause losses to other parties, all members of the Board of Directors of Public Company are responsible for a joint responsibility. This is because the statement of directors' responsibility for financial statements binds legally and is the juridical responsibility of all members of the Board of Directors.

Q: What are the suggestions for refinement of rules?

A: This study suggested that the Bapepam UUPT and Regulation Number VIII.G.11 be refined, especially related to:

A more clear and detailed description of good and full of responsibility, which includes the standard of care, the principle of duty of care, good faith, and rational base in business decision making.
Affirmation of the boundaries and the extent to which liability randomly all members of the Civil Board of Directors.
Arrangements regarding criminal sanctions on any violations of the financial statements of the Directors of Public Company as Lex Specialists from the Capital Market Provisions.

Q: Why is it important to refine the rules?

A: Refining the rules is important to create a clearer understanding of the Directors of Public Companies and stakeholders about their obligations and responsibilities regarding financial statements. This can also help in building the trust and credibility of the capital market in Indonesia.

Q: What are the benefits of having clear and detailed rules?

A: Having clear and detailed rules can help to:

Ensure that the financial statements are accurate, reliable, and transparent.
Prevent violations of the financial statements of the Directors of Public Company.
Provide a clear and detailed description of the boundaries and extent of liability of the Directors.
Provide for criminal sanctions on any violations of the financial statements of the Directors of Public Company.