Improve internal processes

Oct 13, 2025 by pynkocean.com 118 views

The Influence of Company Size, Profitability, Solvency, and KAP Size on Audit Report Lag at Service Companies Registered on the IDX in 2012-2015

Introduction

The Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) is one of the largest stock exchanges in Southeast Asia, with a significant number of service companies listed on it. As a result, the quality of audit reports has become a crucial factor in maintaining investor confidence and market transparency. However, the delay in audit reports has been a persistent issue, affecting the efficiency and effectiveness of the audit process. This study aims to analyze the effect of company size, profitability, solvency, and size of the Public Accountant Firm (KAP) on the delay of audit reports on service companies registered on the IDX in the 2012 to 2015 period.

Background

The audit process is a critical component of corporate governance, providing stakeholders with an independent assessment of a company's financial statements. However, the delay in audit reports can have significant consequences, including reduced investor confidence, increased costs, and decreased transparency. In recent years, the IDX has implemented various measures to improve the quality of audit reports, including the introduction of new audit standards and the establishment of an audit committee. Despite these efforts, the delay in audit reports remains a persistent issue, affecting the efficiency and effectiveness of the audit process.

Methodology

This study used a purposive sampling method to select 27 service companies listed on the IDX in the 2012 to 2015 period. The data used in this study were obtained from audited financial statements, independent auditor reports, and annual reports from sample companies. All of the data were downloaded from the official IDX website at www.idx.co.id. To analyze the data, descriptive statistical analysis techniques were used.

Results

The results of this study showed that changes in company size, profitability, and KAP size have a significant effect on the delay in audit reports. However, partial solvency does not show a significant effect on the delay. When analyzed simultaneously, company size, profitability, solvency, and KAP size have been proven to have a significant influence on the delay in audit reports.

Discussion

The significant influence of company size, profitability, and KAP size on delays in the audit report shows the importance of these factors in managing the audit process in service companies. Larger company size usually means having more resources, so that it can accelerate the completion of financial statements and audits. Companies that have high profitability tend to have more incentives to produce timely reports, in order to maintain investor confidence and other stakeholders.

On the other hand, the size of the KAP also plays an important role. Larger and more experienced KAP usually has a more efficient audit process, thus helping to shorten the time of completing audit reports. This is in line with industrial practice which shows that larger public accounting firms tend to have better standards in terms of efficiency and speed.

Meanwhile, the results showing that solvency did not have a significant influence on the delay in audit reports it could be interpreted that the availability of funds and company liquidity did not always have a direct impact on the speed of completing audit reports. This may be caused by the internal complexity faced by the company in preparing financial statements or external conditions that affect the audit process.

Conclusion

This research provides valuable insights for service companies and auditors, as well as other stakeholders. By understanding the factors that influence the delay in audit reports, companies can take steps to improve the process and improve efficiency, which in turn can increase transparency and trust in the market. The findings of this study suggest that companies should focus on improving their internal processes, including the preparation of financial statements and the audit process, in order to reduce the delay in audit reports.

Recommendations

Based on the findings of this study, the following recommendations are made:

Improve internal processes: Companies should focus on improving their internal processes, including the preparation of financial statements and the audit process, in order to reduce the delay in audit reports.
Increase transparency: Companies should increase transparency in their financial reporting, including the disclosure of audit reports and other relevant information.
Enhance auditor independence: Companies should ensure that auditors are independent and free from any conflicts of interest, in order to maintain the integrity of the audit process.
Implement new audit standards: The IDX should implement new audit standards that require companies to provide timely and accurate financial information, in order to improve the quality of audit reports.

Limitations

This study has several limitations, including:

Sample size: The sample size of this study is relatively small, which may limit the generalizability of the findings.
Data availability: The data used in this study were obtained from audited financial statements, independent auditor reports, and annual reports from sample companies. However, the availability of data may be limited, which may affect the accuracy of the findings.
Methodology: The methodology used in this study is descriptive statistical analysis, which may not capture the underlying causes of the delay in audit reports.

Future Research

This study provides a foundation for future research on the factors that influence the delay in audit reports. Future studies should focus on:

Investigating the underlying causes of the delay: Future studies should investigate the underlying causes of the delay in audit reports, including the internal complexity faced by companies in preparing financial statements and the external conditions that affect the audit process.
Developing new audit standards: Future studies should develop new audit standards that require companies to provide timely and accurate financial information, in order to improve the quality of audit reports.
Evaluating the effectiveness of audit committees: Future studies should evaluate the effectiveness of audit committees in improving the quality of audit reports and reducing the delay in audit reports.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on the Influence of Company Size, Profitability, Solvency, and KAP Size on Audit Report Lag

Q: What is the main objective of this study?

A: The main objective of this study is to analyze the effect of company size, profitability, solvency, and size of the Public Accountant Firm (KAP) on the delay of audit reports on service companies registered on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) in the 2012 to 2015 period.

Q: What is the significance of this study?

A: This study provides valuable insights for service companies and auditors, as well as other stakeholders. By understanding the factors that influence the delay in audit reports, companies can take steps to improve the process and improve efficiency, which in turn can increase transparency and trust in the market.

Q: What are the key findings of this study?

A: The key findings of this study are:

Changes in company size, profitability, and KAP size have a significant effect on the delay in audit reports.
Partial solvency does not show a significant effect on the delay.
When analyzed simultaneously, company size, profitability, solvency, and KAP size have been proven to have a significant influence on the delay in audit reports.

Q: What are the implications of this study?

A: The implications of this study are:

Companies should focus on improving their internal processes, including the preparation of financial statements and the audit process, in order to reduce the delay in audit reports.
Companies should increase transparency in their financial reporting, including the disclosure of audit reports and other relevant information.
Companies should ensure that auditors are independent and free from any conflicts of interest, in order to maintain the integrity of the audit process.

Q: What are the limitations of this study?

A: The limitations of this study are:

The sample size of this study is relatively small, which may limit the generalizability of the findings.
The data used in this study were obtained from audited financial statements, independent auditor reports, and annual reports from sample companies. However, the availability of data may be limited, which may affect the accuracy of the findings.
The methodology used in this study is descriptive statistical analysis, which may not capture the underlying causes of the delay in audit reports.

Q: What are the future research directions?

A: The future research directions are:

Investigating the underlying causes of the delay in audit reports, including the internal complexity faced by companies in preparing financial statements and the external conditions that affect the audit process.
Developing new audit standards that require companies to provide timely and accurate financial information, in order to improve the quality of audit reports.
Evaluating the effectiveness of audit committees in improving the quality of audit reports and reducing the delay in audit reports.

Q: What are the practical implications of this study?

A: The practical implications of this study are:

Companies should prioritize the improvement of their internal processes, including the preparation of financial statements and the audit process, in order to reduce the delay in audit reports.
Companies should increase transparency in their financial reporting, including the disclosure of audit reports and other relevant information.
Companies should ensure that auditors are independent and free from any conflicts of interest, in order to maintain the integrity of the audit process.

Q: What are the policy implications of this study?

A: The policy implications of this study are:

Regulatory bodies, such as the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX), should develop and implement new audit standards that require companies to provide timely and accurate financial information, in order to improve the quality of audit reports.
Regulatory bodies should also establish guidelines for audit committees to ensure that they are effective in improving the quality of audit reports and reducing the delay in audit reports.