Improve the distribution of resources

Oct 13, 2025 by pynkocean.com 88 views

The Influence of Distributive Justice and Procedural Justice on the Managerial Performance of the SKPD through the Clarity of the Budget Target in the Karo Regency Government

Introduction

In the context of regional government, the performance of the Regional Work Unit (SKPD) is a crucial factor in achieving the goals and objectives of the government. The performance of SKPD is influenced by various factors, including the clarity of budget targets. This study aims to investigate and analyze the effect of distributive justice and procedural justice through the clarity of budget targets on the managerial performance of the SKPD in the Karo Regency Government.

The Importance of Distributive Justice and Procedural Justice

Distributive justice and procedural justice are two important concepts in the context of organizational behavior. Distributive justice refers to the fairness of the distribution of resources and rewards within an organization. When employees feel that they receive rewards in accordance with their contributions, their work motivation will increase. Conversely, if employees feel that the results received are unfair, then this can reduce morale and potentially have a negative impact on performance.

Procedural justice, on the other hand, refers to the fairness of the decision-making process within an organization. Transparent and participatory processes in decision making will increase employee confidence in management. When employees feel involved and listened to in this process, they are more likely to commit to the targets set, including budget goals.

The Role of Clarity of Budget Targets

Clear budget targets provide guidance employees that they can follow to achieve the targets set. This will encourage employees to work harder in achieving predetermined goals, so that eventually a positive impact on the managerial performance of the SKPD. The clarity of budget targets is also important in ensuring that employees understand their roles and responsibilities in achieving the targets set.

The Influence of Distributive Justice and Procedural Justice on Managerial Performance

The results of this study indicate a simultaneous influence between distributive justice and procedural justice through the clarity of budget targets on the managerial performance of the SKPD in the Karo Regency Government. This shows that when employees feel that justice in the distribution of resources and the decision-making process is well applied, they tend to be more able to work optimally.

Theoretical Framework

The theoretical framework of this study is based on the concept of distributive justice and procedural justice. Distributive justice is related to employee perception of the balance of results received compared to the efforts made. Procedural justice, on the other hand, is related to how the decision was taken and the extent to which the process was considered fair.

Methodology

The population in this study includes regional apparatus apparatus who occupy structural positions, such as the head of the agency, head of service, and head of the section, as well as relevant positions. Determination of the number of samples using the Slovin approach to ensure that the research results can be generalized. Before testing the hypothesis, the first step taken is to test the validity and reliability of the instrument used, followed by a classic assumption test and multiple linear regression analysis.

Conclusion

This study confirms the importance of the application of the principles of justice in government organizations. By paying attention to distributive and procedural justice and ensuring the clarity of budget goals, SKPD management in Karo Regency can create a more productive and responsive work environment. This is expected to make a significant contribution in improving public performance in the area.

Recommendations

Based on the findings of this study, the following recommendations are made:

Improve the distribution of resources: SKPD management in Karo Regency should ensure that resources are distributed fairly and in accordance with the needs of employees.
Ensure transparency and participation in decision making: SKPD management in Karo Regency should ensure that decision-making processes are transparent and participatory, involving employees in the decision-making process.
Provide clear budget targets: SKPD management in Karo Regency should provide clear budget targets that are achievable and aligned with the goals and objectives of the organization.
Monitor and evaluate performance: SKPD management in Karo Regency should monitor and evaluate the performance of employees regularly, providing feedback and coaching to improve performance.

Limitations of the Study

This study has several limitations, including:

Limited sample size: The sample size of this study is limited, which may affect the generalizability of the findings.
Limited scope: This study only focuses on the influence of distributive justice and procedural justice on managerial performance, and does not consider other factors that may influence performance.
Methodological limitations: This study uses a quantitative approach, which may not capture the nuances of the complex relationships between distributive justice, procedural justice, and managerial performance.

Future Research Directions

Future research should aim to:

Investigate the influence of other factors on managerial performance: Future research should investigate the influence of other factors, such as leadership style, organizational culture, and employee engagement, on managerial performance.
Use a mixed-methods approach: Future research should use a mixed-methods approach, combining both quantitative and qualitative methods, to capture the complexities of the relationships between distributive justice, procedural justice, and managerial performance.
Investigate the impact of distributive justice and procedural justice on employee well-being: Future research should investigate the impact of distributive justice and procedural justice on employee well-being, including job satisfaction, motivation, and turnover intention.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about the Influence of Distributive Justice and Procedural Justice on Managerial Performance

Q: What is distributive justice and how does it relate to managerial performance?

A: Distributive justice refers to the fairness of the distribution of resources and rewards within an organization. When employees feel that they receive rewards in accordance with their contributions, their work motivation will increase. Conversely, if employees feel that the results received are unfair, then this can reduce morale and potentially have a negative impact on performance.

Q: What is procedural justice and how does it relate to managerial performance?

A: Procedural justice refers to the fairness of the decision-making process within an organization. Transparent and participatory processes in decision making will increase employee confidence in management. When employees feel involved and listened to in this process, they are more likely to commit to the targets set, including budget goals.

Q: How does the clarity of budget targets influence managerial performance?

A: Clear budget targets provide guidance employees that they can follow to achieve the targets set. This will encourage employees to work harder in achieving predetermined goals, so that eventually a positive impact on the managerial performance of the SKPD.

Q: What are the benefits of applying distributive justice and procedural justice in government organizations?

A: By paying attention to distributive and procedural justice and ensuring the clarity of budget goals, SKPD management in Karo Regency can create a more productive and responsive work environment. This is expected to make a significant contribution in improving public performance in the area.

Q: How can SKPD management in Karo Regency improve the distribution of resources?

A: SKPD management in Karo Regency should ensure that resources are distributed fairly and in accordance with the needs of employees. This can be achieved by conducting regular performance evaluations, providing training and development opportunities, and promoting a culture of fairness and transparency.

Q: How can SKPD management in Karo Regency ensure transparency and participation in decision making?

A: SKPD management in Karo Regency should ensure that decision-making processes are transparent and participatory, involving employees in the decision-making process. This can be achieved by holding regular meetings with employees, soliciting feedback and suggestions, and providing clear and timely communication.

Q: What are the limitations of this study?

A: This study has several limitations, including:

Limited sample size: The sample size of this study is limited, which may affect the generalizability of the findings.
Limited scope: This study only focuses on the influence of distributive justice and procedural justice on managerial performance, and does not consider other factors that may influence performance.
Methodological limitations: This study uses a quantitative approach, which may not capture the nuances of the complex relationships between distributive justice, procedural justice, and managerial performance.

Q: What are the implications of this study for SKPD management in Karo Regency?

A: The findings of this study have significant implications for SKPD management in Karo Regency. By paying attention to distributive and procedural justice and ensuring the clarity of budget goals, SKPD management in Karo Regency can create a more productive and responsive work environment. This is expected to make a significant contribution in improving public performance in the area.

Q: What are the future research directions?

A: Future research should aim to:

Investigate the influence of other factors on managerial performance: Future research should investigate the influence of other factors, such as leadership style, organizational culture, and employee engagement, on managerial performance.
Use a mixed-methods approach: Future research should use a mixed-methods approach, combining both quantitative and qualitative methods, to capture the complexities of the relationships between distributive justice, procedural justice, and managerial performance.
Investigate the impact of distributive justice and procedural justice on employee well-being: Future research should investigate the impact of distributive justice and procedural justice on employee well-being, including job satisfaction, motivation, and turnover intention.