Not considered other variables

Oct 13, 2025 by pynkocean.com 12 views

The Influence of Industrial Type, the Size of the Board of Commissioners and Profitability on the Disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility with Institutional Ownership as a Moderating Variable in Companies Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange

Introduction

In recent years, the disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has become a crucial aspect of business operations. Companies are increasingly expected to demonstrate their commitment to social and environmental responsibility, and to disclose their CSR activities to stakeholders. This study aims to investigate the effect of industrial type, the size of the board of commissioners, and profitability on the disclosure of CSR in manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX), with institutional ownership as a moderating variable.

Background

The disclosure of CSR is a complex issue that involves various factors, including industrial type, board of commissioners' size, and profitability. Industrial type refers to the sector in which a company operates, and different sectors have different characteristics and CSR pressures. For example, companies in the energy sector may face greater CSR pressures due to their impact on the environment, while companies in the technology sector may face greater CSR pressures due to their impact on employment and innovation.

The size of the board of commissioners is another important factor that can influence CSR disclosure. A larger board of commissioners may have a greater capacity and resource to oversee and encourage companies to run CSR programs. Profitability is also an important factor, as companies with high profitability tend to have greater resources to run CSR programs.

Institutional ownership is also an important factor that can influence CSR disclosure. Share ownership by institutions such as pension funds and mutual funds can influence company decisions related to CSR. However, the effect of institutional ownership on CSR disclosure is still unclear, and this study aims to investigate its moderating effect.

Research Methods

This study uses a quantitative approach with multiple linear regression analysis. The data used comes from the annual reports of 50 manufacturing companies listed on the IDX in the 2012-2013 period. The sampling method uses purposive sampling, which is the selection of samples based on certain criteria.

Results and Discussion

The results of the analysis show that:

Simultaneous effect: Industrial type, board of commissioners' size, and profitability (F Test) significantly influenced the disclosure of manufacturing company CSR registered on the IDX in the 2012-2013 period. That is, the three variables together play an important role in encouraging CSR disclosure.
Partial effect: Partial analysis (T test) shows that only the size of the board of commissioners has a positive and significant influence on CSR disclosure. Industry type and profitability do not have a significant influence.

These results show that manufacturing companies with larger boards of commissioners tend to be more open in expressing their CSR activities. This could be because the larger board of commissioners has a greater capacity and resource to oversee and encourage companies to run CSR programs.

Moderation of Institutional Ownership

This study also investigated the effect of institutional ownership moderation on the relationship between independent variables and CSR disclosures. However, the results showed that institutional ownership was unable to moderate the relationship. That is, institutional ownership has no significant effect on the level of CSR disclosure.

Implications

The results of this study have several implications for various parties, including:

For investors: Investors can use information related to the board of commissioners, industry types, and profitability of the company as an indicator for assessing the level of CSR disclosure and company performance.
For companies: Manufacturing companies can take advantage of this research to improve their CSR disclosure strategies. Pay attention to the size of the board of commissioners and strengthen the role of the board of commissioners in encouraging and overseeing the CSR program can be an effective step.
For regulators: The results of this study can be taken into consideration in formulating policies that encourage companies to increase transparency and accountability in CSR disclosure.

Limitations

This research has several limitations, such as:

Limited research period: The research period is limited to 2012-2013, which may not be representative of the current CSR disclosure practices.
Limited research samples: The research samples are limited to 50 companies, which may not be representative of the entire manufacturing sector.
Not considered other variables: This study does not consider other variables that might affect CSR disclosure, such as company size, industry type, and CSR program characteristics.

Conclusion

This study proves that the size of the board of commissioners has a significant influence on CSR disclosure in manufacturing companies listed on the IDX. Subsequent research can expand the research period, increase samples, and add other relevant variables to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the factors that influence CSR disclosure.

Recommendations for Future Research

Based on the findings of this study, several recommendations for future research can be made:

Investigate the effect of institutional ownership: Future research can investigate the effect of institutional ownership on CSR disclosure, and explore the moderating effect of institutional ownership on the relationship between independent variables and CSR disclosures.
Consider other variables: Future research can consider other variables that might affect CSR disclosure, such as company size, industry type, and CSR program characteristics.
Expand the research period: Future research can expand the research period to include more recent data, and explore the changes in CSR disclosure practices over time.

By addressing these limitations and expanding the research scope, future research can provide a more comprehensive understanding of the factors that influence CSR disclosure, and contribute to the development of effective CSR disclosure strategies for companies listed on the IDX.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about the Influence of Industrial Type, the Size of the Board of Commissioners and Profitability on the Disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility

Q: What is Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)?

A: CSR refers to a company's responsibility to act in a way that benefits society and the environment, in addition to generating profits. This includes activities such as philanthropy, environmental sustainability, and social responsibility.

Q: What is the significance of CSR disclosure?

A: CSR disclosure is important because it allows stakeholders to understand a company's commitment to social and environmental responsibility. It also helps to build trust and credibility with stakeholders, and can be a key factor in a company's reputation and brand value.

Q: What are the factors that influence CSR disclosure?

A: The factors that influence CSR disclosure include industrial type, the size of the board of commissioners, and profitability. This study found that the size of the board of commissioners has a significant influence on CSR disclosure, while industry type and profitability do not have a significant influence.

Q: What is the role of institutional ownership in CSR disclosure?

A: Institutional ownership refers to the ownership of a company's shares by institutions such as pension funds and mutual funds. This study found that institutional ownership does not have a significant effect on CSR disclosure, and does not moderate the relationship between independent variables and CSR disclosures.

Q: What are the implications of this study for investors?

A: Investors can use information related to the board of commissioners, industry types, and profitability of the company as an indicator for assessing the level of CSR disclosure and company performance.

Q: What are the implications of this study for companies?

A: Manufacturing companies can take advantage of this research to improve their CSR disclosure strategies. Pay attention to the size of the board of commissioners and strengthen the role of the board of commissioners in encouraging and overseeing the CSR program can be an effective step.

Q: What are the implications of this study for regulators?

A: The results of this study can be taken into consideration in formulating policies that encourage companies to increase transparency and accountability in CSR disclosure.

Q: What are the limitations of this study?

A: This research has several limitations, including a limited research period, limited research samples, and not considering other variables that might affect CSR disclosure.

Q: What are the recommendations for future research?

A: Future research can investigate the effect of institutional ownership, consider other variables that might affect CSR disclosure, and expand the research period to include more recent data.

Q: What are the practical implications of this study for companies and regulators?

A: The practical implications of this study are that companies should pay attention to the size of the board of commissioners and strengthen the role of the board of commissioners in encouraging and overseeing the CSR program. Regulators can use the results of this study to formulate policies that encourage companies to increase transparency and accountability in CSR disclosure.

Q: What are the theoretical implications of this study?

A: The theoretical implications of this study are that the size of the board of commissioners has a significant influence on CSR disclosure, and that institutional ownership does not have a significant effect on CSR disclosure. This study contributes to the development of a more comprehensive understanding of the factors that influence CSR disclosure.

Q: What are the future research directions?

A: Future research can investigate the effect of institutional ownership, consider other variables that might affect CSR disclosure, and expand the research period to include more recent data.