Regulation of Criminal Acts of Theft in the Criminal Code

Oct 13, 2025 by pynkocean.com 101 views

Analysis of Criminal Acts of Theft with Violence in the Perspective of Criminology

Decision Study Number 3629/PID.B/2019/PN MDN and Number 296/PID.B/2020/PN MDN

Criminal acts of theft with violence are a serious problem that continues to plague society. Not only do these crimes cause material harm, but they also leave victims with emotional trauma and suffering. In this article, we will delve into the legal regulations regarding theft by violence in the Criminal Code (KUHP), the causes of these crimes, and the judges' decisions related to cases identified with numbers 3629/Pid.B/2019/PN MDN and 296/PID.B/2020/PN MDN.

Regulation of Criminal Acts of Theft in the Criminal Code

The Criminal Code regulates criminal acts of theft in the second book, CHAPTER XXII, concerning Crimes against assets, which includes Articles 362 to 367. Theft by violence is regulated in Article 365, which confirms that acts of theft accompanied by threats or physical violence can be subject to prison sanctions that are quite heavy. Although the law is clear, the main challenge lies in the implementation of the law and how the judge's decision can be effective in overcoming this criminal offense.

The Criminal Code provides a clear framework for addressing theft by violence, but the effectiveness of the law depends on the implementation and the judges' decisions. A thorough understanding of the law and its application is crucial in preventing and addressing these crimes.

Factors Causing Criminal Act of Theft by Violence

Based on the analysis conducted, there are two categories of factors causing criminal acts of theft with violence: internal and external factors.

Internal Factors

Individuals: Personality and basic nature of the individual can affect the emergence of intention to commit criminal acts. Despair or frustration can increase the chance of a person to switch to the criminal path.
Family: A family environment that is less harmonious and neglect can cause individuals to find recognition and income through illegal methods.
Economy: Economic instability is a major driving factor that can trigger acts of theft, especially in a financially vulnerable society.
Education: The low level of education makes individuals lack skills and knowledge to get a decent job, so crime becomes an option.

External Factors

Environment: The environment that is full of crime and violence can create norms that accept criminal behavior.
Technology Development: Technology can be used to commit more efficient crimes, such as in the case of digital theft, which can increase the complexity of physical crime.

Understanding the causes of theft by violence is crucial in developing effective strategies to prevent and address these crimes. By identifying the internal and external factors that contribute to these crimes, we can develop targeted interventions to address the root causes of the problem.

Efforts to Overcome the Criminal Acts of Theft with Violence

Management of criminal acts of theft with violence needs to be carried out comprehensively through two approaches: penal effort and non-identification efforts.

Penal Effort

Applying strict legal sanctions against perpetrators of criminal acts to provide a deterrent effect. However, special attention to the imposition of punishment to be proportional to the level of crime committed.

Non-identification Efforts

Social intervention, education, and improvement of economic welfare to prevent the potential for perpetrators of crime in the future. This countermeasures include coaching programs to improve skills and education in the community.

A comprehensive approach that combines penal and non-identification efforts is necessary to effectively address theft by violence. By providing a deterrent effect through strict sanctions and addressing the root causes of the problem through social intervention and education, we can reduce the incidence of these crimes.

Analysis of the Judge's Decision

Regarding the judge's decision in the case number 3629/Pid.B/2019/PN MDN and Number 296/PID.B/2020/PN MDN, there is a criticism of the sanctions imposed. In this case, the defendant was sentenced to prison for 4 years and 2 years and 6 months. This is considered too light considering Article 365 of the Criminal Code which states that the perpetrators of criminal acts of theft with violence should be subject to sanctions of at least 9 years in prison. The decision raises questions about the effectiveness of the justice system in providing a penalty that is worth and able to prevent the recurrence of similar crimes.

The judge's decision in this case highlights the need for a more effective and consistent application of the law. By providing a penalty that is proportional to the level of crime committed, we can ensure that the justice system is effective in preventing the recurrence of similar crimes.

Conclusion

The crime of theft with violence is a serious problem that requires attention from various aspects. The legal arrangement already exists in the Criminal Code, but its implementation must be strengthened through a more assertive law enforcement effort and more severe sanctions for the perpetrators. In addition, the prevention approach through education, improvement of welfare, and community empowerment is also important to reduce the number of crime in the future. Judges' decisions that are less firm in providing sanctions are also one of the obstacles in creating the expected deterrent effect.

In conclusion, a comprehensive approach that combines penal and non-identification efforts is necessary to effectively address theft by violence. By providing a deterrent effect through strict sanctions and addressing the root causes of the problem through social intervention and education, we can reduce the incidence of these crimes.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Analysis of Criminal Acts of Theft with Violence in the Perspective of Criminology

Decision Study Number 3629/PID.B/2019/PN MDN and Number 296/PID.B/2020/PN MDN

In this article, we will address some of the most frequently asked questions about the analysis of criminal acts of theft with violence in the perspective of criminology.

Q: What is the definition of theft by violence?

A: Theft by violence is a type of crime that involves the use of threats or physical violence to commit theft. This type of crime is regulated in Article 365 of the Criminal Code (KUHP).

Q: What are the causes of theft by violence?

A: The causes of theft by violence can be categorized into internal and external factors. Internal factors include personality, family environment, economic instability, and low level of education. External factors include environment, technology development, and social norms.

Q: What are the consequences of theft by violence?

A: The consequences of theft by violence can be severe, including material harm, emotional trauma, and suffering for victims. In addition, the perpetrators of these crimes can face severe sanctions, including imprisonment.

Q: What is the role of the judge in addressing theft by violence?

A: The judge plays a crucial role in addressing theft by violence by providing a penalty that is proportional to the level of crime committed. The judge's decision should be firm and effective in preventing the recurrence of similar crimes.

Q: What are the challenges in addressing theft by violence?

A: One of the challenges in addressing theft by violence is the implementation of the law. The law is clear, but its implementation depends on the effectiveness of the justice system. In addition, the judges' decisions can be inconsistent, which can create obstacles in creating the expected deterrent effect.

Q: What are the solutions to address theft by violence?

A: A comprehensive approach that combines penal and non-identification efforts is necessary to effectively address theft by violence. This includes applying strict legal sanctions against perpetrators and addressing the root causes of the problem through social intervention and education.

Q: What is the importance of education in addressing theft by violence?

A: Education is crucial in addressing theft by violence. By providing education and skills training, we can empower individuals to make informed decisions and avoid engaging in criminal behavior.

Q: What is the role of the community in addressing theft by violence?

A: The community plays a crucial role in addressing theft by violence. By working together with law enforcement and social services, we can create a safer and more supportive environment that prevents the recurrence of similar crimes.

Q: What is the future of addressing theft by violence?

A: The future of addressing theft by violence is promising. By implementing a comprehensive approach that combines penal and non-identification efforts, we can reduce the incidence of these crimes and create a safer and more just society.

In conclusion, addressing theft by violence requires a comprehensive approach that combines penal and non-identification efforts. By providing a deterrent effect through strict sanctions and addressing the root causes of the problem through social intervention and education, we can reduce the incidence of these crimes and create a safer and more just society.