Relationship of Behavior 3M Plus and Abatization of the Existence of Aedes Aegypti Mosquitoes in the Community in Medan Denai District

Oct 13, 2025 by pynkocean.com 139 views

Relationship of Behavior 3M Plus and Abatization of the Existence of Aedes Aegypti Mosquitoes in the Community in Medan Denai District

Background

Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever (DHF) continues to be a serious public health problem in Indonesia, with a significant number of cases reported in Medan Denai District. In 2014, the district recorded 94 cases and two deaths, highlighting the need for effective measures to control the spread of the disease. One of the efforts made to overcome this problem was the eradication of mosquito nests (PSN), which included the 3M Plus behavior (draining, Close, and bury) and the method of abatization. This study aims to determine the relationship between 3M plus behavior and abatization of the existence of Aedes Aegypti mosquito larvae in the region.

Research Methods

This study uses an observational analytic method with a cross-sectional design to collect data through interviews using questionnaires and direct observations at the respondent's house. This approach allows researchers to obtain more accurate information about community behavior related to mosquito control and its impact on the existence of larvae.

Research Results

The results of the study show that the behavior of 3M Plus among the Medan Denai community was at a sufficient level, with most people practicing the 3M Plus behavior. However, only a few people carried out routine abatization. Statistical analysis shows that the 3M Plus behavior has a significant relationship with the existence of Aedes aegypti larvae, with the Fisher's Exact Test value of P = 0.029 (CI 95%). Meanwhile, abatization does not show a significant relationship with the presence of larvae, with p = 0.127 (CI 95%).

Furthermore, multiple logistic regression analysis confirms that both 3M Plus behavior (p = 0.017, CI 95% = 0.024 to 0.692) and abatization (p = 0.006, CI 95% = 1.835 to 39.867) have a significant association with the presence of Aedes aegypti larvae.

Analysis

The data obtained from the study show that the 3M plus behavior is more influential than abatization in reducing the number of mosquito larvae. This suggests that people who are active in applying 3M Plus tend to have lower larvae. This could be caused by more direct and focused precautions carried out by the community, such as draining puddles, closing water reservoirs, and burying items that can hold rainwater.

However, the low level of abatization shows a lack of understanding or public awareness of the importance of this method. Abatisation, which involves the use of insecticides to kill larvae, can be one of the effective ways to control mosquitoes, but requires active participation from the community and support from health agencies.

Conclusion

Based on the results of this study, it is expected that the community is more active in reducing mosquito breeding places by applying 3M plus behavior consistently. The Puskesmas is also expected to improve coordination with the community and health cadres to strengthen efforts to control DHF vectors. With this collective effort, it is expected that the incidence of DHF can be reduced, and the health of the community in Medan Denai District can be maintained properly.

Recommendations

Community Education: The community needs to be educated about the importance of abatization and its role in controlling mosquito breeding.
Improved Coordination: The Puskesmas needs to improve coordination with the community and health cadres to strengthen efforts to control DHF vectors.
Increased Abatization: The community needs to increase their participation in abatization to reduce the number of mosquito larvae.
Monitoring and Evaluation: Regular monitoring and evaluation of the effectiveness of 3M Plus behavior and abatization need to be conducted to identify areas for improvement.

Future Research Directions

Longitudinal Study: A longitudinal study needs to be conducted to examine the long-term effects of 3M Plus behavior and abatization on the incidence of DHF.
Comparative Study: A comparative study needs to be conducted to compare the effectiveness of 3M Plus behavior and abatization in different communities.
Intervention Study: An intervention study needs to be conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of a community-based intervention program that combines 3M Plus behavior and abatization.

By addressing the limitations of this study and exploring new research directions, it is hoped that this study will contribute to the development of effective strategies to control the spread of DHF in Medan Denai District and beyond.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about the Relationship of Behavior 3M Plus and Abatization of the Existence of Aedes Aegypti Mosquitoes in the Community in Medan Denai District

Q: What is the 3M Plus behavior?

A: The 3M Plus behavior is a set of practices that involve draining, closing, and burying items that can hold rainwater to prevent mosquito breeding. This behavior is a key component of the efforts to control the spread of Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever (DHF) in Medan Denai District.

Q: What is abatization?

A: Abatization is the use of insecticides to kill mosquito larvae. This method is one of the effective ways to control mosquitoes, but it requires active participation from the community and support from health agencies.

Q: What is the relationship between 3M Plus behavior and abatization?

A: The study found that the 3M Plus behavior has a significant relationship with the existence of Aedes aegypti larvae, while abatization does not show a significant relationship with the presence of larvae. However, multiple logistic regression analysis confirms that both 3M Plus behavior and abatization have a significant association with the presence of Aedes aegypti larvae.

Q: Why is 3M Plus behavior more influential than abatization?

A: The study suggests that people who are active in applying 3M Plus tend to have lower larvae. This could be caused by more direct and focused precautions carried out by the community, such as draining puddles, closing water reservoirs, and burying items that can hold rainwater.

Q: What are the limitations of this study?

A: The study has several limitations, including the use of a cross-sectional design, which may not capture the long-term effects of 3M Plus behavior and abatization. Additionally, the study only examined the relationship between 3M Plus behavior and abatization in one community, Medan Denai District.

Q: What are the recommendations for future research?

A: The study recommends that future research should include a longitudinal study to examine the long-term effects of 3M Plus behavior and abatization, a comparative study to compare the effectiveness of 3M Plus behavior and abatization in different communities, and an intervention study to evaluate the effectiveness of a community-based intervention program that combines 3M Plus behavior and abatization.

Q: What are the implications of this study for public health policy?

A: The study has implications for public health policy, particularly in the context of DHF control. The study suggests that 3M Plus behavior is a key component of DHF control efforts, and that abatization should be promoted as a complementary method to control mosquito breeding.

Q: What are the next steps for implementing the findings of this study?

A: The next steps for implementing the findings of this study include educating the community about the importance of abatization, improving coordination between the Puskesmas and the community, increasing abatization participation, and conducting regular monitoring and evaluation of the effectiveness of 3M Plus behavior and abatization.

Q: How can readers get involved in DHF control efforts?

A: Readers can get involved in DHF control efforts by promoting 3M Plus behavior and abatization in their communities, supporting public health initiatives, and advocating for increased funding for DHF control programs.