The Importance of Law Number 1 of 1974 Concerning Marriage

Oct 13, 2025 by pynkocean.com 125 views

Introduction

Marriage is a sacred bond between a man and a woman, aimed at forming a happy and eternal family, with a foundation of the Almighty God. In Indonesia, the validity of a marriage is governed by Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage. However, in today's society, there are deviations from these conditions, one of which is the forgery of gender identity. This identity forgery has the potential to have serious legal consequences for the parties involved. In this article, we will conduct a juridical analysis of similar marriages that occur due to falsification of identity in terms of Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage.

The Importance of Law Number 1 of 1974 Concerning Marriage

Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage is a fundamental law that governs the institution of marriage in Indonesia. The law stipulates that marriage is a union between a man and a woman, and that the absolute requirement for a marriage to be considered valid is the existence of a man and a woman. The law also provides for the rights and obligations of the parties involved in a marriage, including the right to own property, the right to inheritance, and the obligation to provide for each other's well-being.

The Problem of Identity Forgery in Similar Marriages

Identity forgery is a serious issue that can have significant legal consequences for the parties involved in a marriage. According to Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage, similar marriages that occur due to counterfeiting identity are prohibited and cannot be justified. This is explained in Article 1, Article 22, and Article 27 paragraph (2) of the Law, as well as in Article 72 of the Compilation of Islamic Law and Article 266 of the Criminal Code. The law stipulates that the validity of a marriage must be based on the clarity of the gender identity of each pair.

Legal Consequences of Identity Forgery

The legal consequences of similar marriages due to identity forgery are very significant. First, the marriage is considered to have never existed, so that the legal status of each party returns to the position before the marriage is carried out. In this case, the court has the right to decide that both parties are never bound in a marriage legally. Second, regarding joint property, assets owned by husband and wife remain separated, both inheritance and assets obtained each during the marriage period.

Legal Protection for the Disadvantaged Party

Legal protection for disadvantaged parties in similar marriage cases due to identity forgery consists of preventive and repressive protection. Preventive protection can be done by providing socialization and education about marriage law and the importance of honesty in expressing identity. Meanwhile, repressive protection includes legal action against the perpetrators of identity forgery and the restoration of rights for the disadvantaged party.

Preventive Protection

Preventive protection is an essential aspect of legal protection for disadvantaged parties in similar marriage cases due to identity forgery. This can be achieved through socialization and education about marriage law and the importance of honesty in expressing identity. By providing education and awareness about the consequences of identity forgery, individuals can make informed decisions about their marriage and avoid the risks associated with identity forgery.

Repressive Protection

Repressive protection is another essential aspect of legal protection for disadvantaged parties in similar marriage cases due to identity forgery. This includes legal action against the perpetrators of identity forgery and the restoration of rights for the disadvantaged party. The court has the right to decide that both parties are never bound in a marriage legally, and to restore the rights of the disadvantaged party.

Conclusion

From this juridical analysis, it can be concluded that the forgery of identity in similar marriages is clearly contrary to the provisions of the law in force in Indonesia. The legal consequences of these actions do not only have an impact on the legal status of the parties involved, but also have implications for the distribution of assets and legal protection. Therefore, it is essential for the community to understand and respect existing legal provisions, as well as maintaining honesty in every aspect of life, including in terms of marriage.

Recommendations

Based on this juridical analysis, the following recommendations can be made:

Education and Awareness: Provide education and awareness about marriage law and the importance of honesty in expressing identity.
Legal Action: Take legal action against the perpetrators of identity forgery and restore the rights of the disadvantaged party.
Socialization: Socialize the importance of honesty in expressing identity and the consequences of identity forgery.
Legal Reform: Reform the law to provide more effective protection for disadvantaged parties in similar marriage cases due to identity forgery.

By implementing these recommendations, the community can work towards preventing identity forgery and ensuring that the rights of all parties involved in a marriage are protected.

Limitations of the Study

This study has several limitations, including:

Scope: The study only focuses on the legal aspects of identity forgery in similar marriages and does not consider the social and cultural implications.
Data: The study relies on secondary data and does not collect primary data.
Methodology: The study uses a descriptive analytic method and does not employ a comparative analysis.

Despite these limitations, this study provides a comprehensive analysis of the legal aspects of identity forgery in similar marriages and highlights the importance of education, awareness, and legal action in preventing identity forgery.

Future Research Directions

Future research can build on this study by:

Conducting a Comparative Analysis: Conducting a comparative analysis of the legal provisions regarding identity forgery in similar marriages in different countries.
Collecting Primary Data: Collecting primary data through surveys, interviews, or focus groups to gain a deeper understanding of the social and cultural implications of identity forgery.
Employing a Qualitative Methodology: Employing a qualitative methodology to gain a more nuanced understanding of the experiences of individuals involved in similar marriage cases due to identity forgery.

By conducting further research, scholars can provide a more comprehensive understanding of the complex issues surrounding identity forgery in similar marriages and inform policy and legal reforms to protect the rights of all parties involved.

Q: What is the main purpose of Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage?

A: The main purpose of Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage is to govern the institution of marriage in Indonesia, including the requirements for a valid marriage, the rights and obligations of the parties involved, and the consequences of identity forgery.

Q: What is identity forgery in the context of marriage?

A: Identity forgery in the context of marriage refers to the act of falsifying one's gender identity in order to enter into a marriage. This can include presenting oneself as a different gender or age in order to meet the requirements for a valid marriage.

Q: What are the legal consequences of identity forgery in similar marriages?

A: The legal consequences of identity forgery in similar marriages include the annulment of the marriage, the separation of joint property, and the restoration of rights for the disadvantaged party.

Q: What is preventive protection in the context of identity forgery?

A: Preventive protection in the context of identity forgery refers to the measures taken to prevent identity forgery from occurring in the first place. This can include education and awareness about marriage law and the importance of honesty in expressing identity.

Q: What is repressive protection in the context of identity forgery?

A: Repressive protection in the context of identity forgery refers to the measures taken to punish those who have committed identity forgery and to restore the rights of the disadvantaged party.

Q: What are the limitations of this study?

A: The limitations of this study include its scope, which only focuses on the legal aspects of identity forgery in similar marriages, and its methodology, which relies on secondary data and does not employ a comparative analysis.

Q: What are the future research directions for this study?

A: Future research directions for this study include conducting a comparative analysis of the legal provisions regarding identity forgery in similar marriages in different countries, collecting primary data through surveys, interviews, or focus groups, and employing a qualitative methodology to gain a more nuanced understanding of the experiences of individuals involved in similar marriage cases due to identity forgery.

Q: What are the recommendations for preventing identity forgery in similar marriages?

A: The recommendations for preventing identity forgery in similar marriages include education and awareness about marriage law and the importance of honesty in expressing identity, legal action against those who have committed identity forgery, and socialization of the importance of honesty in expressing identity.

Q: What is the importance of understanding and respecting existing legal provisions in preventing identity forgery in similar marriages?

A: Understanding and respecting existing legal provisions is essential in preventing identity forgery in similar marriages because it ensures that the rights of all parties involved in a marriage are protected and that the consequences of identity forgery are clear and well-defined.

Q: What is the role of education and awareness in preventing identity forgery in similar marriages?

A: Education and awareness play a crucial role in preventing identity forgery in similar marriages by providing individuals with the knowledge and understanding of the importance of honesty in expressing identity and the consequences of identity forgery.

Q: What is the importance of socialization in preventing identity forgery in similar marriages?

A: Socialization is essential in preventing identity forgery in similar marriages because it helps to create a culture of honesty and transparency in expressing identity and promotes the importance of respecting existing legal provisions.

Q: What is the role of legal action in preventing identity forgery in similar marriages?

A: Legal action plays a crucial role in preventing identity forgery in similar marriages by punishing those who have committed identity forgery and restoring the rights of the disadvantaged party.

Q: What is the importance of reforming the law to provide more effective protection for disadvantaged parties in similar marriage cases due to identity forgery?

A: Reforming the law to provide more effective protection for disadvantaged parties in similar marriage cases due to identity forgery is essential because it ensures that the rights of all parties involved in a marriage are protected and that the consequences of identity forgery are clear and well-defined.