The use of dental models and panoramic photos is a crucial aspect of this study

Oct 13, 2025 by pynkocean.com 74 views

The Transverse Curved Relationship of the Maxillary on the Posterior Unilateral Crossbite with the Asymmetry of the Mandibular Gonial Angle

In the field of dentistry, unilateral posterior crossbite is one type of malocclusion that is common. This study aims to determine whether there is a relationship between the maxillary transverse arches and the mandible gonial asymmetry in patients who experience unilateral posterior crossbite. Understanding the relationship between the maxillary transverse arch and the mandibular gonial angle is crucial in addressing the functional and aesthetic problems caused by this type of malocclusion. The mandibular gonial angle is a significant aspect of the mandible's shape and structure, and its asymmetry can have a significant impact on the overall oral health of an individual.

Background

Unilateral posterior crossbite is a type of malocclusion that occurs when the upper teeth bite inside the lower teeth on one side of the mouth. This can cause various functional and aesthetic problems, including difficulty in chewing and speaking, as well as an uneven smile. The maxillary transverse arch is the shape and structure of the upper jaw, and its relationship with the mandible gonial angle is an important aspect of understanding the development of malocclusion. The mandibular gonial angle is a critical factor in determining the shape and structure of the lower jaw, and its asymmetry can have a significant impact on the overall oral health of an individual.

Research Methods

This study involved 53 patients with unilateral posterior crossbite malocclusion. The maxillary transverse arch type was determined by measuring the difference between the crossbite and non-crossbite sides on the dental model, using the techniques described by Ferro et al. The use of dental models is a crucial aspect of this study, as it allows for the accurate measurement of the maxillary transverse arch. Meanwhile, the mandibular gonial angle was measured by comparing the angles on the left and right sides using the Raminez-Yanez method from Panoramic Photos. The use of panoramic photos is a non-invasive and accurate method of measuring the mandibular gonial angle. The data obtained was then analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis test to determine the relationship between the two variables.

Research Results

The results of the analysis showed that there was no significant difference between the maxillary transverse arch and the mandibular gonial angle, with the value of P = 0.08 (p <0.05). The lack of significant difference between the two variables is a crucial finding of this study, as it suggests that the maxillary transverse arch does not affect the mandibular gonial angle in patients with unilateral posterior crossbite. The average mandibular gonial angle on the right side is 122.59 ° ± 8.33 ° with a median of 123 °, while on the left side is 122.58 ° ± 8.34 ° with a median of 122 °. This shows that the asymmetry of the mandibular gonial angle in patients with unilateral posterior crossbite is not significant between the left and right sides.

Conclusion

Based on the results of this study, it can be concluded that the maxillary transversal arch does not affect the mandibular gonial angle in patients with unilateral posterior crossbite. The lack of significant difference between the two variables is a crucial finding of this study, as it suggests that other factors may play a role in the development of crossbite and mandibular asymmetry. This study opens the possibility for further study that explores other factors that may play a role in the development of crossbite and mandibular asymmetry.

Keywords

Asymmetry
Mandibular gonial angle
Unilateral posterior crossbite
Maxillary transverse arch

Analysis

This study provides important insights for professionals in the field of orthodontic and dentistry, because it helps understand the relationship between the shape and structure of the jaw and the malocclusion that is often found. The use of the right method in measurement and analysis is also a crucial factor for getting accurate and relevant results. In the future, deeper research can help find more effective interventions for patients with similar conditions, as well as increasing understanding of the development of malocclusion and its effect on overall oral health.

Implications

This study has several implications for the field of orthodontic and dentistry. The lack of significant difference between the maxillary transverse arch and the mandibular gonial angle suggests that other factors may play a role in the development of crossbite and mandibular asymmetry. This study opens the possibility for further study that explores other factors that may play a role in the development of crossbite and mandibular asymmetry. The use of dental models and panoramic photos is a crucial aspect of this study, as it allows for the accurate measurement of the maxillary transverse arch and the mandibular gonial angle.

Limitations

This study has several limitations. The sample size of 53 patients is relatively small, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. The use of dental models and panoramic photos may also be limited by the accuracy of the measurements, which may be affected by various factors such as the quality of the dental models and the panoramic photos. Further research is needed to confirm the findings of this study and to explore other factors that may play a role in the development of crossbite and mandibular asymmetry.

Future Directions

This study opens the possibility for further study that explores other factors that may play a role in the development of crossbite and mandibular asymmetry. The use of dental models and panoramic photos is a crucial aspect of this study, as it allows for the accurate measurement of the maxillary transverse arch and the mandibular gonial angle. Further research is needed to confirm the findings of this study and to explore other factors that may play a role in the development of crossbite and mandibular asymmetry.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about the Transverse Curved Relationship of the Maxillary on the Posterior Unilateral Crossbite with the Asymmetry of the Mandibular Gonial Angle

Q: What is the purpose of this study? A: The purpose of this study is to determine whether there is a relationship between the maxillary transverse arches and the mandible gonial asymmetry in patients who experience unilateral posterior crossbite.

Q: What is unilateral posterior crossbite? A: Unilateral posterior crossbite is a type of malocclusion that occurs when the upper teeth bite inside the lower teeth on one side of the mouth.

Q: What is the maxillary transverse arch? A: The maxillary transverse arch is the shape and structure of the upper jaw.

Q: What is the mandibular gonial angle? A: The mandibular gonial angle is a critical factor in determining the shape and structure of the lower jaw.

Q: What methods were used to measure the maxillary transverse arch and the mandibular gonial angle? A: The maxillary transverse arch was measured using dental models, while the mandibular gonial angle was measured using panoramic photos.

Q: What was the sample size of this study? A: The sample size of this study was 53 patients.

Q: What was the main finding of this study? A: The main finding of this study was that there was no significant difference between the maxillary transverse arch and the mandibular gonial angle in patients with unilateral posterior crossbite.

Q: What are the implications of this study? A: The implications of this study are that other factors may play a role in the development of crossbite and mandibular asymmetry.

Q: What are the limitations of this study? A: The limitations of this study are that the sample size was relatively small and the use of dental models and panoramic photos may be limited by the accuracy of the measurements.

Q: What are the future directions of this study? A: The future directions of this study are to confirm the findings of this study and to explore other factors that may play a role in the development of crossbite and mandibular asymmetry.

Q: What are the potential applications of this study? A: The potential applications of this study are to improve the diagnosis and treatment of unilateral posterior crossbite and to increase understanding of the development of malocclusion and its effect on overall oral health.

Q: What are the potential benefits of this study? A: The potential benefits of this study are to improve the quality of life of individuals with unilateral posterior crossbite and to reduce the risk of complications associated with this condition.

Q: What are the potential risks of this study? A: The potential risks of this study are that the findings may not be generalizable to other populations and that the use of dental models and panoramic photos may be limited by the accuracy of the measurements.

Q: How can this study be replicated? A: This study can be replicated by using a larger sample size and by using more accurate methods of measuring the maxillary transverse arch and the mandibular gonial angle.

Q: What are the potential future research directions? A: The potential future research directions are to explore other factors that may play a role in the development of crossbite and mandibular asymmetry and to confirm the findings of this study.

Q: What are the potential implications for clinical practice? A: The potential implications for clinical practice are that dentists and orthodontists may need to consider other factors when diagnosing and treating unilateral posterior crossbite and that they may need to use more accurate methods of measuring the maxillary transverse arch and the mandibular gonial angle.