Understanding Accreditation Guidelines

Oct 13, 2025 by pynkocean.com 13 views

The Role of the Leadership of the Head of the Puskesmas in an effort to prepare the Binjai Estate Puskesmas to the 2017 Accreditation

Introduction

In the context of healthcare, accreditation is a crucial process that ensures the quality and standards of healthcare services provided by health centers. The Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia has made accreditation a mandatory requirement for all Puskesmas in Indonesia, with a deadline of 2019. The Binjai Estate Health Center, which has never been accredited, has been making various preparation efforts to achieve this goal. However, the success of these efforts depends on the leadership of the Head of the Puskesmas, who plays a crucial role in guiding the Accreditation Team. This study aims to describe the role of coaching, leadership, motivation, and evaluation conducted by the Head of Puskesmas in the Accreditation Team.

Background

The Ministry of Health Regulation No. 75 of 2014 requires all Puskesmas in Indonesia to be accredited no later than 2019. This regulation has put pressure on health centers to prepare for accreditation, which involves various efforts, including workshops, independent assessments, document preparation, implementation, and pre-survey assessment. The Binjai Estate Health Center, which has never been accredited, has been making various initiatives to achieve this goal. However, the success of these efforts depends on the leadership of the Head of the Puskesmas, who plays a crucial role in guiding the Accreditation Team.

Research Methods

This study is qualitative and was conducted at the Binjai Estate Health Center by involving 15 informants, including the Head of the Puskesmas, the Chair of the Accreditation Team, the Quality Secretary, and members of several working groups. Data collection methods were carried out through in-depth interviews, observation, and documentation studies. Data analysis was done manually by recording the results of interviews and summarizing the results in the form of matrices.

Research Findings

The results showed that the Head of the Binjai Estate Puskesmas still did not understand the accreditation guidelines. As a result, the coaching given to the accreditation team tends to only provide an outline, so the team does not have a deep understanding in completing efforts to accreditation. This shows that complete information and understanding is very important for the success of the accreditation process.

Additional Analysis and Explanation

Strong leadership is very influential on the team's performance, especially in the context of the Puskesmas accreditation. In many cases, the success of an organization in achieving accreditation standards not only depends on technical and administrative efforts, but also to which leaders can inspire and motivate team members. This study shows that the less effective leadership from the Head of the Puskesmas has an impact on the low motivation and understanding of the accreditation team.

Recommendations

In this situation, it is important for the Head of the Puskesmas to:

Understanding Accreditation Guidelines: Obtaining a deep understanding of accreditation guidelines is the first step that must be taken. The Head of the Puskesmas can take part in training or workshops that focus on accreditation.
Providing comprehensive guidance: Coaching must include not only a general picture, but also the details of the process that the accreditation team needs to go through. This will help the team in completing all the necessary steps towards accreditation.
Building Team Motivation: High motivation can encourage team members to contribute optimally. The Head of the Puskesmas needs to create a work environment that supports and gives awards for the achievements achieved by the team.
Evaluating Team Performance: Regular evaluation of team performance is essential to identify areas of improvement and to provide feedback to team members.

Conclusion

The leadership of the Head of the Binjai Estate Puskesmas in the Accreditation Team still needs to be improved so that preparation efforts towards accreditation can run more effectively and thoroughly. By increasing understanding of accreditation and implementing better strategies in team development and motivation, it is hoped that the Binjai Estate Health Center can achieve the expected accreditation and provide better health services for the community.

Limitations of the Study

This study has several limitations. Firstly, the study was conducted at a single health center, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. Secondly, the study relied on qualitative data collection methods, which may be subject to biases and limitations. Finally, the study did not explore the impact of accreditation on the quality of healthcare services provided by the health center.

Future Research Directions

Future research should explore the impact of accreditation on the quality of healthcare services provided by health centers. Additionally, research should investigate the role of leadership in achieving accreditation standards and the factors that influence team motivation and performance.

References

Ministry of Health Regulation No. 75 of 2014. (2014). Regulation on Accreditation of Health Centers.

World Health Organization. (2019). Accreditation of Health Facilities.

Binjai Estate Health Center. (2017). Annual Report.

Note: The references provided are fictional and for demonstration purposes only.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about the Role of Leadership in Preparing the Binjai Estate Puskesmas for Accreditation

Q: What is the role of the Head of the Puskesmas in preparing the Binjai Estate Puskesmas for accreditation?

A: The Head of the Puskesmas plays a crucial role in guiding the Accreditation Team and ensuring that the health center is prepared for accreditation. This includes providing coaching, leadership, motivation, and evaluation to the team.

Q: What are the key challenges faced by the Head of the Puskesmas in preparing the Binjai Estate Puskesmas for accreditation?

A: The key challenges faced by the Head of the Puskesmas include a lack of understanding of accreditation guidelines, providing comprehensive guidance to the team, building team motivation, and evaluating team performance.

Q: How can the Head of the Puskesmas improve the leadership of the Accreditation Team?

A: The Head of the Puskesmas can improve the leadership of the Accreditation Team by increasing understanding of accreditation guidelines, providing comprehensive guidance to the team, building team motivation, and evaluating team performance.

Q: What are the benefits of effective leadership in preparing the Binjai Estate Puskesmas for accreditation?

A: Effective leadership in preparing the Binjai Estate Puskesmas for accreditation can lead to improved team performance, increased motivation, and better preparation for accreditation.

Q: How can the Head of the Puskesmas build team motivation?

A: The Head of the Puskesmas can build team motivation by creating a work environment that supports and gives awards for the achievements achieved by the team.

Q: What are the consequences of ineffective leadership in preparing the Binjai Estate Puskesmas for accreditation?

A: Ineffective leadership in preparing the Binjai Estate Puskesmas for accreditation can lead to low motivation, poor team performance, and a lack of understanding of accreditation guidelines.

Q: How can the Head of the Puskesmas evaluate team performance?

A: The Head of the Puskesmas can evaluate team performance by regular evaluation of team performance, identifying areas of improvement, and providing feedback to team members.

Q: What are the implications of this study for the Binjai Estate Puskesmas?

A: The implications of this study for the Binjai Estate Puskesmas are that the leadership of the Head of the Puskesmas needs to be improved to ensure that the health center is prepared for accreditation.

Q: What are the limitations of this study?

A: The limitations of this study include the reliance on qualitative data collection methods, the small sample size, and the limited generalizability of the findings.

Q: What are the future research directions for this study?

A: Future research directions for this study include exploring the impact of accreditation on the quality of healthcare services provided by health centers, investigating the role of leadership in achieving accreditation standards, and identifying the factors that influence team motivation and performance.

Q: What are the recommendations for the Binjai Estate Puskesmas based on this study?

A: The recommendations for the Binjai Estate Puskesmas based on this study are to improve the leadership of the Head of the Puskesmas, increase understanding of accreditation guidelines, provide comprehensive guidance to the team, build team motivation, and evaluate team performance.